Michael HaberLearn more. ” href=”http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/i-had-a-reckless-driving-charge-and-i-had-it-seale-2183859.html#!” rel=”nofollow” style=”-webkit-transition: all 0.3s ease; color: #006699; text-decoration: none; transition: all 0.3s ease;”>PRO
1 lawyer agreed with this answer
James W Chandler
Criminal Defense Attorney – Naples, FL
” href=”http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/i-had-a-reckless-driving-charge-and-i-had-it-seale-2183859.html#!” rel=”nofollow” style=”-webkit-transition: all 0.3s ease; color: #006699; text-decoration: none; transition: all 0.3s ease;”>1
Criminal Defense Attorney – Naples, FL
1
As to the application you must answer it honestly – per the exact (precise) language in the question (which you have not provided here).
That said, I suspect that it doesn’t much matter where you were arrested, what you were arrested for, what the final disposition was or whether or not you sealed / expunged the record. This is 2015 and we are forehead deep into the internet age, where nothing is private, sacred or truly hidden from public scrutiny.
Sadly, sealing (and expunging) only applies to certain (not even to all) government agencies and has no effect whatsoever on private (er, extortionist) enterprise, who compile and maintain arrest information and then demand that you pay them off to remove your information from their database and public access. Worse still, after you “buy back your information”, then you can count on there being another private company lurking, somewhere, sometime, somehow, just waiting for you to pay them off as well. Its a seemingly never-ending vicious cycle.
For better or for worse you are probably best advised to take the wind out of the sails by admitting your past issues / indiscretions to your present (or potential) employer, lender, landlord, licensing authority, admissions committee, etcetera, rather than waiting for them to find out on their own, but that’s a personal, not a legal, decision.
I hope that I have been helpful in answering your question.


The way I read it the question seems to turn on whether you had it sealed or expunged. If it was sealed then you received a withhold; if it was expunged then your case was dismissed. Thus, if you received a withhold then the question requires a “yes” answer; and if your case was dismissed then we must ascertain why.
The question requires you to admit to an expunged case only if you entered PTD (pretrial diversion, which is also called PTI or pretrial intervention) but not for any other stated reason. Thus, if you have an expunged reckless and your dismissal did not come as a result of PTI then you can answer “no”. However, if it was a “wet reckless” (i.e. a breakdown from a DUI) then you likely received a withhold and will have to answer “yes”, but this is now sheer speculation and you need to know, not guess.
Again, I default to my original answer: “That said, I suspect that it doesn’t much matter where you were arrested, what you were arrested for, what the final disposition was or whether or not you sealed / expunged the record. This is 2015 and we are forehead deep into the internet age, where nothing is private, sacred or truly hidden from public scrutiny.
Sadly, sealing (and expunging) only applies to certain (not even to all) government agencies and has no effect whatsoever on private (er, extortionist) enterprise, who compile and maintain arrest information and then demand that you pay them off to remove your information from their database and public access. Worse still, after you “buy back your information”, then you can count on there being another private company lurking, somewhere, sometime, somehow, just waiting for you to pay them off as well. Its a seemingly never-ending vicious cycle.
For better or for worse you are probably best advised to take the wind out of the sails by admitting your past issues / indiscretions to your present (or potential) employer, lender, landlord, licensing authority, admissions committee, etcetera, rather than waiting for them to find out on their own, but that’s a personal, not a legal, decision.”
www.facebook.com/haberpa /
http://habercriminallaw.blogspot.com
FOLLOW http://habercriminallaw.blogspot.com ~
SUBSCRIBE https://www.youtube.com/c/michaelhaberlaw ~ SEE www.criminallaw.miami ~ CALL 1-888-SHARK-8-1