Meet MMA Fighter “War Machine”, a/k/a Jonathan Paul
War Machine is accused of attacking both his porn star ex-girlfriend, Christy Mack, a/k/a Christine Mackinday, and her friend Corey Thomas on August, 2014. Below is what Christy looked like before the MMA-styled beat-down….
and this is what Christy looked like as she testified about her beat-down in Court yesterday (Wednesday, June 3rd, 2015)…
War Machine stands accused of showing up at Christy’s house on August 8th, 2014 and finding her “with” her friend Corey Thomas. Although War Machine’s jealous rage is only alleged it is indisputable that Christy was transported to the hospital and suffered eighteen (18) broken bones, a broken nose, missing teeth, a fractured rib and a ruptured liver.
In court yesterday (Wednesday, June 3rd, 2015) War Machine blurted out that he wants to take a lie-detector test but a uniformed court officer silenced him and then the Judge told him that polygraph results aren’t admissible in Court. During Christy’s testimony War Machine was also chastised by the Court for exhibiting inappropriate behavior which was formally noted on the record as “laughing and shaking his head in court”.
Memo to War Machine: Your at the time girlfriend was a PORN STAR. She appeared in forty-two (42) porn flicks (in case you missed any of them you can see the complete videography list here) including flicks with men, with women, with men and women, with women and women, with men and men and solo, performing vaginal, anal, strap ons… need I continue? This begs the question: Why in the world would you be shocked or upset MUCH LESS TURN VIOLENT when you find THIS particular girl “with” someone other than you? Look, if you wanted a chaste girlfriend then you should have dated a Nun, not a tatted-up, Mohawked, hottie who dons a strap-on under a phony habit in “Satan’s Holy Whore”. Btw…
Memo to the Folks: Domestic Violence (DV) cases present wrinkles for everyone in the system (the Defendant, the State and the Court), as they almost always involve emotional charged folks who’s lives are either interdependent or interconnected, the potential for repeat or escalated violence is almost always high and there is more often then not the likelihood that a victim will, for whatever reasons, wish not to prosecute the perpetrator. For these reasons, in FL DV cases Defendant’s suffer aggressive prosecution (more aggressive than many other offenses), the State feels obligated to “force” all victim’s to “help themselves” (which serves the dual purpose of covering its own ass in the event of a subsequent violent altercation) and the Court engages in pure self-protection (no Judge wants to read her/his name in the paper as being responsible for “cutting loose” the repeat DV offender who re-injures, more seriously injures or kills a victim when the Court could have acted to prevent the same from occurring). These are the practical realities of DV cases that we all must live with and it is for these reasons that there is a mandatory 24 hold (a statutorily required cooling-off period) for anyone booked into a FL jail for any DV case and that DV victim’s are afforded special protections, are required to be evaluated (if only by responding officers who have a DV “checklist”) and are required to be provided information about alternatives to returning to “life” with the alleged perpetrator
-
Top notch, very skilled, and highly attentive. Mr. Haber is a fantastic criminal defense attorney. 
- Thanks again. You are second to none when it comes to defending your clients. For that, I thank you
-
